Fascinating and long article (via dihard) about how the internet is changing how we read — and, as a result, how we think.
One thread that sticks out is about how we do much more “skimming”, due to online reading.
When we read online, [Maryanne Wolf, a developmental psychologist at Tufts University,] says, we tend to become “mere decoders of information.” Our ability to interpret text, to make the rich mental connections that form when we read deeply and without distraction, remains largely disengaged.
According to the article, here’s what we may stand to lose:
The kind of deep reading that a sequence of printed pages promotes is valuable not just for the knowledge we acquire from the author’s words but for the intellectual vibrations those words set off within our own minds. In the quiet spaces opened up by the sustained, undistracted reading of a book, or by any other act of contemplation, for that matter, we make our own associations, draw our own inferences and analogies, foster our own ideas. Deep reading, as Maryanne Wolf argues, is indistinguishable from deep thinking.
The observation that we skim more superficially is not particularly surprising or new; nor are the author’s and Wolf’s reservations about such changes.
But they miss something big. Online media certainly do encourage spending much less time “interpreting text” and making “rich mental connections” while we’re sitting there reading your article. These very same media, though, allow for much more active writing, wherein, as members of the former audience, ”we make our own associations, draw our own inferences and analogies, foster our own ideas”.
-
benkraal reblogged this from dihard and added:
Somewhere in the article, Nicholas Carr writes:...True. Yet he finishes the article...
-
mark reblogged this from dihard and added:
I could only manage...third of the way through…
-
ilikeyou reblogged this from dihard and added:
A friend of mine said...he’s started actually ‘talking’
-
eweworldorder reblogged this from dihard
-
timnoetzel reblogged this from dihard and added:
comment was concious of the irony of that statement? I don’t.
-
garywu reblogged this from gelgels and added:
Been feeling exactly the same way, when I saw this magazine cover at Borders last night.
-
gelgels reblogged this from dihard and added:
I find this true as well. When I was growing up, my mother trained me to be a voracious reader. I read several books in...
-
cellophanegirl reblogged this from dihard and added:
it makes me sad.
-
bidoun reblogged this from dihard and added:
I’m relieved to know...this is affecting scholars. Well, not so much relieved but...
-
ali-sun reblogged this from rach and added:
THIS IS SO TRUE…
-
thakker reblogged this from dihard and added:
sticks out is about how we do much more “skimming”, due to online reading....article,...
-
efstein reblogged this from rach and added:
‘literary types’...article refers to,...completely...
-
nikophony reblogged this from dihard
-
pema reblogged this from rach
-
pmore reblogged this from dihard
-
supernice reblogged this from rach
-
davidphalen reblogged this from dihard and added:
Interesting article, mentioning 2001… “HAL’s outpouring of feeling contrasts with the emotionlessness that characterizes...
-
bluenemesis reblogged this from dihard and added:
Uh oh. I knew I wasn’t nearly so ADD before. My favorite is...author laments our near...
-
rach reblogged this from dihard and added:
Also like this quote within...piece from playwright Richard Foreman: “I come from a...
-
mikehudack reblogged this from dihard
-
dihard posted this